Defensive Impact

Are defenders making opponents miss? We compare actual shooting percentages to what we'd expect based on shot location and the shooter's season averages.

Cached
3:03 PM

SAS Defense vs NYK

43.3%0.0%40.0%0.0%35.3%
ZoneFGAFGMFG%vs Avg
Restricted Area672943.3%-22.7%
Mid-Range251040.0%-1.0%
Above Break 3341235.3%-0.7%
Paint (Non-RA)100.0%-42.0%
Left Corner 3300.0%-39.0%
Defense Rating: Excellent Average Poor

NYK Defense vs SAS

42.1%0.0%37.5%33.3%31.4%
ZoneFGAFGMFG%vs Avg
Above Break 3351131.4%-4.6%
Restricted Area572442.1%-23.9%
Mid-Range24937.5%-3.5%
Right Corner 33133.3%-5.7%
Paint (Non-RA)100.0%-42.0%
Defense Rating: Excellent Average Poor

SAS Defense

OpponentNYK
Shots allowed130
Points allowed110.0
Expected points150.0
Delta-40.0

NYK Defense

OpponentSAS
Shots allowed120
Points allowed101.0
Expected points137.1
Delta-36.1

How we calculate this

We estimate "expected points" based on each shot's location and the shooter's season averages. A negative delta means the defense held opponents below expectations.

  • Zone FG% = Made shots ÷ Attempted shots per zone
  • Expected = Shot value × Player's baseline FG% for that zone
  • Delta = Actual − Expected (negative = good defense)

Note: True defensive impact requires tracking data (Second Spectrum) for matchup-level analysis. This uses shot zones as a proxy.